Homo Sapiens and her world
HOW HUMAN’s CULTURAL ENDEAVORS STARTED AND DEVELOPED
(inspired by Damasio’s 2018 book: The Strange Order of Things and a few own thoughts)
The human organism (HS) and her activities may be looked at through different lenses: e.g.A. As a product of the Biological Evolution (BEvo) B. As a product of the Cultural Evolution (CEvo) A. A Human as a Biological Organism with specific and unique properties
While a lot of changes to living Organisms (O) have been brought forward by the BEvo, seen over close to 4 B years, many of its features and functions of today were already present in Os from the beginning of LIFE; e g in bacteria where the fight for survival and cooperation abilities were present even w/o intelligence and a nervous system. In one way or another many of these abilities are still present and involved and even dominant in human life processes but using much more sofisticated machinery. Life, even on very basic levels, can act as if it had intelligence and a complex nervous system! Life on current highest levels of complexity had Precursor already in very primitiv life.
Much of a humans unique status among the Organisms can be attributed to her special kind of intelligens and verbal language contributes a lot to her dominance in various fields. Not so frequently however, is the following bundle of functionalities emphasized:
Every Organism is equipped with a very sofisticated regulating system: Homeostasis. It can do much more than a standard regulating system; it not only detects and reacts to her right/wrong states but can also distinguish different levels of the O’s states/emotions on a scale from pain to pleasure/flourishing, meaning that activities with pleasurable outcome are favored and even promoted. The regulation is also adapted to that situation. This makes emotions>homeostasis>feelings an essential part of the human life-process. Not only internal states are engaging Homeostasis; miscellaneous signals from the external environment change the O’s status and get involved via the Emotions>Homeostasis>Feelings interface. One example is how music is affecting the O. Try, consentrated, listening to Mahler’s 9th symphony, the 4th movement and experience how the intensity of the music is squeezing your body? That is emotions caused by music in ways that we do not know all about.
The working of feelings constitute the conscious effects of the Homeostatic regulation. Isn’t this the way use of e g drugs is favored by the human organism? And why a drug war aiming at killing the Suppliers has no chanses to succeed? As long as there is a market there will be suppliers.
Lots of emotions have also subconscious effects.
– The intrinsic yearning to survive, flourish and replicate
Against which criteria is the Homeostasis regulation done? I can only offer the informed guess that the purpose of the/any O supplies the target points and that the ultimate target point/purpose is the mission to accelerate Entropy. An indicator supporting that assumption is the prominent, if not superior status of the emotion of orgasm. A high Replication rate is the most efficient way of increasing Life’s contribution to the Universe’s Entropy-race and the O’s orgasm yearning are very much involved therein.
There are good reasons to also include the part of an O that we know exists but we can not grasp with our senses; the human organism consists of about 10 times as many microorganisms and energy/quantum fields as those we are aware of! And, of course, homeostasis works also on and with them; with emotions happening and at least some floating up into feelings i .e. into the conscious realm. I have not seen much research about this and, thus, have nothing more to say about it.
Recently a, not known in detail, communicationsystem directly between cells has been reported. But I have not seen any details on my level of understanding. 2019 Nobel price in Medicine indicates direct influence by an environmental property (the quality of oxygen) and the functioning of the human body. Let us have respect for what could be?
Coherent experimental observations suggest that there are at least one more basic power beside the 4 traditional’ ones.
It is motivated to be very cautious about conclusions on how Universe is working.
– Consciousness
I assumed, in Mar 2018, after reading Damasio’s book: ‘The Strange Order of Things’, a first time, that the discussion about Consciousness (C) would ebb out and
I felt that no further explanations were needed following Damasio’s concept on the body- brain connection including the identification of the role of subjectivity in what is normally referred to as consciousness. But, of course, I have no need for detailed explanations in academic terms; but that is, as I suspect, the main occupation for some participants of the debate. So, read this with the appropriate reservation : it is scientifically supported common sense
C is a WHOLE BODY – experience, not only something emanating from the most advanced cortex functionality. And it is a subjective experience! Nobody can (yet! ) register w/o your consent what you are conscious about in a certain moment.
The most forceful triggers of C are homeostatically registered/promoted emotions, converted to feelings, by participation of many of the body’s systems: the nervous system, of course, then the endocrine system with lots of contributions, the immune system and many more.
The fact that many of the humans so called high C functions are not late evolutionary add ons but had it’s precursors in primitive life, down to one cell organisms at the time when life started is, as Damasio writes….’ Very strange’ , indeed. E. g . bacteria have the ability to sense the presense of and chose to cooperate or fight other bacteria in the neighbourhood. This is also what occupies HS every day on another scale of complexity (due to the CEvo) and shouldn’t it motivate some ‘soul-searching’?
E. G:
– The Biblical concept of Homo Sapiens general supremacy among living Organisms, incl. special rights, is not well founded in many, probably most, cases. It has many consequences that only might be motivated as ‘traditions’ but when studied more in detail reveals a blatant consequence of the ‘might is right’-principle of the BEvo. E g in so called sports hunting, medical testing on animals using Nature as a big waste basket and other. In his 2019 book, Frans de Waal presents lots of strong Indications rendering many of traditional HS claims dubious. Frans draws on a lifelong study of chimps and bonobos who act very ‘human’ in many respects.
– There are strong reasons to look at a HS as one integrated unit but also to extend that view to other parts of Life as an integrated/embedded part of the Universe. We are all made of the same particles and the possibility that we are just an integrated part of a larger Totality, but on a different organizational level should not be dismissed lightly; it may just be that we do not have the apparatus to register and understand it.
– Since 30 K years the human brain is decreasing in volum! In his latest book ‘The Goodness Paradox’, Richard Wrangham presents new views, from quite interesting angles on how HS evolved/was ‘domesticated’ to what she is – and is still evolving to be . Dare to read it with an open mind. (YouTube has interesting interviews with Wrangham.)-
IT WOULD NOT BE EASY TO FIND TWO ORGANISMS WHO HAVE THE SAME CONSCIOUS EXPERIENCE OF THE UNIVERSE OR EVEN THE HUMAN DOMAIN!
I guess that no O has a true representation of the total objectivity, if there is one. The fact that we know very little about the true objective status of Universe and all that is therein and that it is changeing continuously is , of course, the main reason, but also the degree to which credible facts are stored in the actual organism is strongly contributing to the variation. Through miscellaneous activities in the Culturally Evolved Human Domain we are presented with not only observed facts but also pure believes that are presented as facts. (by religions, philosophers etc). One big problem is that many O do not even discriminate between Belief and observed Facts (that always have to be attached a certain probability, indicating its supposed level of correctness.)
Miscellaneous reports from the science community (mid 2019) makes it risky to base one’s worldview on what can be perceived by one’s senses, only. Because, probably I, seen as physical organism (O) can also pick up information from activities that are not in my subjective experience/conscious realm? We know already that a lot of information processing is going on in subconsciousness. Now, there are reports about communication systems between cells in the body that we still can not describe. There are still many functions of the human Organism that await full disclosure.
How to deal with all the uncertainty?
In his celebrated metod, Bayes is offering a constructive way of handling this matter. Especially his method for incorporating new knowledge into held opinions (which could be a mix of belief and facts with different probailities attached) thereby in(de)creasing the probability that the opinion is correct, at least temporary, is very helpful. On a subjective level, as always.
Now, Oct 2019, a Nobel price was awarded to the researchers who found out that our CELLS can detect and react to changes in the oxygen concentration/quality around. I use Bayes to increase my probability that a HS Organism is, indeed, an organization in the Totality of Energy fields/particles with subconscious sensitivity and reaction to the environment.B. As a product of the Cultural Evolution (CEvo)
Many of the recent developments in the Human Domain are directed by the strong, so called CEvo.
The CEvo accelerates evolution in specific locals of the human domain, enormously, and gives Homo Sapiens (HS) a unique position among life on Earth.
HS CEvo is based on the BEvo and is foremost defined by HS intelligence, sociality and language capacities. That’s the most common explanation to her endeavors in Arts, Philosophy, Justice, Politics, Religion, Governance, Economics, Technology , Sciences, Tourism, Sports incl. Competitions, (Binge)drinking, Gastronomy, other celebrations of different kinds, weapon development’s skills and Organisations for conducting wars etc; all happened very recently; on the Universal time scale. I prefer to see the CEvo as different colors sprayed upon the more stable background of the BEvo. Relatively easy to wash off and normally not staying long time (on the cosmic timescale).
– Why and how did this start?
Written Language, Intelligence and Natural Selection (genes) are , of course, main drivers but could , according to Damasio, not have done it alone; needed were also Motives, Monitors and Negotiators!
ANSWER: Affects i. e. emotions, supply the needed drivers. Homeostasis supplies the monitoring and regulating. And the resulting feelings are involved in running the daily business of the HS Organism and her Groups. The CEvo is, thus, very much influenced and defined by the BEvo.
Motives
Not only the Organisms’ survival but also their strive towards ‘ free from pain’ or at the opposite pole, a pleasurable life or future prosperity, supply the Motives for the actions of the ‘cultural mind’. Probably, all of it is created by Homeostasis, reacting to emotions, which are then experienced as feelings. (Feelings are the conscious representation of emotions.)
Damasio sees a much wider particpation of affects > feelings in all human’s cultural endeavors than is usually acknowledged. Of course, the nervous system plays a central role but the common attitude that ‘ the body supplies a ‘pole’ on which the brain is playing out its master’s role is thoroughly refuted by Damasio. Instead, he insists, that the whole body participates in the game and emotions and homeostasis has a very important, integrating role in all the activities.
The electro-chemical ++ internal communications systems, (of which we still don’t know very much) between different parts and systems of the body indeed makes the nervous system/brain, while still very important, just a part of the whole happening.
Exemples of EMOTIONS role in different CEvo devellopments:
-In dentistry the PAIN factor has played a big role in the Evo of metods and instrumentation. PROFIT, even GREED are drivers.
-Diagnosing sicknesses in Medicin did not Evolve as an intelligent play but was driven by freedom-of-PAIN Emotions, caused by Homeostatic monitoring and regulating of the organism itself; and creating the feelings that makes the organism take additional conscious corrective action.
-Modern diagnostic methods of conscious patients attach high value , for the initial decision, to the ‘history’ of the patient. At least in the Philippines. I understand this as a recognition of the role of Homeostasis, induced by emotions, made feelings, and what they tell about the status of the organism. (Damasio goes as far as to state that there is really no need to go to the doctor to find out if everyting is OK with your organism; listening to your homeostasis takes you a long way)
Adding further measurements(lab tests) is, in fact, a practical use of Bayes methods in order to improve the diagnostic . When gene-therapy technology has been develloped further it will replace the neccesity to ask questions about ‘the history’, because the genes will reveal it all.
-CURIOSITY was/is the motivation for miscellaneous scientific and philosophical efforts.
-FEAR of the unknown, of angry Gods, of LOVING benevolent Gods etc helped create religions. The market for religions was very fertile and soon they took on a life on their own, and still do. A Religion is a typical (inter)subjective reality but given a status of objektivity in the business of religions. (Priests need income to survive! God is not feeding them) Religions are possible because our brain can, relatively easy be convinced to believe. The more unbelievable the easier the selling … (see also my blog Nov 2018:TUR – The Ultimate Religion; also Michael Shermer’s book: The Believing Brain delivers many interesting aspects)
-The need/feeling of SECURITY was one reason for the CEvo of governance/defence systems; so also of the feeling of POWER over the situation/other Os, to ones own advantage.
The Institution of Marriage is mainly built on emotions, in many cultures with a degree of personal freedom; mainly physical attraction, not least sexual, common interests which are often emotionally controlled and, thus, not very stable. Chinese attitudes are more down to earth: marriage is business… love is….
-Technology was helped by many different Feelings to get off the ground: live a more COMFORTABLE and CONVENIANT life, do things with less EFFORT etc Help to satisfy the CURIOSITY about the Universe.
-A successful hunt e g started the feeling of HAPPINESS and resulted often in dance and music expressions. Music and the art expressions were also often a tool to express SADNESS.
-Politics did not started in order to give juicy and high prestige positions to politicians! It started as a down<up movement when a group was formed to fend for the members interests, in competition with others. Somebody was more clever or dominant and was the leader and his BEvo status helped him to gain from it and politics took on its own life as. That is why survival, with expansions, is one of the most important motivations of politics and a point of basic rang in group-homeostatic regulation. Thus, control of the resources and the feeling of power over others are the motivators still now when politics has taken on a life of its own. Lots of emotions are in play. Greed is also frequently involved. Try to convince yourself that top politicians are working for you, the voter!?! Religions are, one way or another, in the same game and has also taken on a life of its own.
– TRY YOUR OWN ANALYSIS:
Search Internet on ‘Emotion’ and you can find an initial list of some 70 of them; then ‘play’ by trying to connect some of them with human CEvo endeavors. It is fascinating to detect how wide the grasp of Emotions/Feelings is, i. e. how close to the material structure/expression of the O much of human’s, what we like to call sofisticated thinking and behavior is. Much of what we do was familiar to the bacteria, some 4 B years ago.
The human body with its emotions is indeed so much more than a support for the nervous system aka brain.
– Bonus products
Damasio’s findings also make it easier to examine and explain functions of supernatural or mysterious character in the Human Domain. E. G. the so commonly celebrated human soul as an objective reality did not survive the scrutiny. But it has a good life in the realm of Subjective Reality, fired up by religious organizations I e the place where priests of religious Organisations are dwelling.
Religions that try to sell you the idea that God is an objective reality have a hard time when confronted with Damasio`s findings.
So far so good ……. Any attempt by me to give justice to Damasios book in a summary would be futile. His way of explaining things is so rich and so beautiful that I would put a shame on myself in trying to summarize it all. I have now- march 2019 – listened to his book > 4 times and I like it more and more.C. FURTHER EVOLUTION OF THE HUMAN DOMAIN?
The present trend, according to Pinker, when counting number of killed people, is, towards more civility. He gives no guarantee for a continuation of this trend.
But it is necessary to disregard the high —probability proposal that a human is an Organism existing under the laws of physics, evolving through Natural Selection pressures and is only temporarily and partly influenced by different CEvo happenings in order to believe that she will, ever, live in a world where The Golden (GR), or even Silver Rule (SR) rules. (CEvo Happenings normally survive only a blink on the cosmic time scale) and maybe a Golden Rule state would not even be a desirable development ? Because:
Humanity’s embracing of the GR could lead to less competition and stagnation in many fields of its activities and this could mean unheard-of negative consequences; not least, because it would collide with Entropy’s aim.
The success of LIFE, especially HS, (due to its Entropy-acceleration efficiency) is weighing hard on the Earth and may have the power to change basic functions of the system. What About how plastics waste is destroying a lot. The current so called climate debate is using that possibility to encourage the masses to corrective actions.
SOME OTHER POSSIBLE HAPPENINGS
1. HS may destroy herself by accident – nuclear catastrophy; war with other WMD e g biotechnological, chemical, with potential to destroy all human’s and more.
2. General AI or ASI may take over and ‘resign’ the humans
3. AI will continue to introduce benefits to the humans; cyberhumans will enter the stage. And Homo Sapiens will learn how to live a great life supported by AI on different levels but totally other than the the work-for-your-own-sustaing-concept.
4. We will learn enough to be able to eradicate all causes of malfunctioning of the human Organism, including the ability to enhance its functions; consequences could be very variated; the whole, health care system would be revolutionized. Genetechnology will take over and genelabs will replace most hospitals..
5. Human relationships may continue to change in line with what S Pinker has concluded i e towards less physical violence for still some time?
6. Pinker’s findings may still stand but what Natural Selection has planted will not eradicate humans drive to excert power over the ‘others’ and, thereby, gain benefits. The Entropy goal stands. Wars will still be there but sometimes change face; less blood and more mental destruction.
7. And many more …..
Some people tell me:’ …. don’t think so much…’. Instead: Just enjoy life as much as possible….
MY ANSWER: I ENJOY DOING THE LEARNING AND THINKING. It is kind of relief from what has happened earlier in life when I mainly was running after commercial success’ in order to satisfy the owners of the capital.